I (literally) applaud what is expressed in this article.

When it comes to different points of view, say, between Nazis and Liberals (people who take equality and liberty for all to be the ‘twin pillars of justice’ for a just society), the problem for the point of view expressed in this article is that both sides in that conflict seek arbitrarily to privilege one belief (or set of beliefs) over another. What is really needed for justice is an ethic that follows not from belief, but from observation within material existence ("objective reality"). Such an ethic can truly be called "The Ethic of Justice" (here in Medium, but not behind the paywall).