I agree with the analysis in this article.

I came to the conclusion some years ago that in today's economy (as opposed to the societal situation in Marx's formative years) the focus should be on money--specifically, income--rather than property. Income should be divorced from ownership of the means of production, but that can be accomplished without altering the structure of the existing economy or the way it functions. In the approach I have developed there would still be different (and unlimited) benefits that would accrue to different positions in the economy, but those would not allow for unlimited differences in personal wealth, given that all employees in any business or government would have the same monetary income. (Eventually, differences in benefits might be eliminated--we have to leave something for future generations to do.) A different approach to income would generate a commensurate distribution of property over time via the market mechanism (shaped by personal tastes and preferences operating within the income constraint that all employees would share in common).

Part of the beauty of this approach to remuneration is that it would encourage creativity and innovation by making royalties flowing from intellectual properties the source for the highest income in the economy. At the same time, no one would have any incentive to discourage innovations.