I actually don't see any particular value in an absolutely equal distribution of income and wealth. On the other hand, for civilization as we know it to survive we are probably at the point at which we must limit consumption. I have developed a paradigm that could accomplish that--while eliminating taxes and public debt as well as (involuntary) unemployment and poverty.

Regarding this article from Mr. Pellissier, the most significant point is that all employees of any business or government (as well as retirees and adults unable to work) would have the same income. Different benefits (negotiated by individuals and their employers) would still accrue to people employed in different positions in the economy.

The amount of that income would be based on current income. In the U.S., as of 2020 the average personal income was c. $62,000 and the median c. $43,000, so I recommend $52,000. The absence of taxes would make the ‘purchasing power’ of that income more like c. $72,000 today. It would be as easy as not to pay that income to one parent in a household with at least one dependent child present to perform that role. So for a couple with at least one child the standard income would be equivalent to c. $144,000 with only one of them having to work outside the home.

People who were neither the employer nor the employee of any business or government could earn whatever they could, selling whatever (legal) good or service they might have to offer. People paid royalties for intellectual properties would be included in that category.

if curious: “To Preserve What We Have, What We Have Must Be enough”