Entertaining, I haven't read B., though I have read a good bit about his philosophizing. My experience with reading postmodernists is that many of them can't resist making outrageous--and outrageously obtuse--remarks that require stupid amounts of effort to see what is there that is worth such effort. Still, I do think they have made valuable criticisms of the 'Enlightenment project' and, in doing so, positive contributions to epistemology and ontology. The best approach for me has been to read (most) postmodernists (Lyotard is one exception) superficially and let the major themes condense of themselves within the plasma, as it were. Anyone who wants to get an appreciation for what postmodernism does have to contribute should read Political Theory and Postmodernism by Stephen K. White. He packs a whole lot into a very small book.